Personally I've never understood the hate directed towards carebears, they are the ones who keep the servers online and pay the developers pay checks. If you try to force those people into PVP by making removing security from high sec incursions they aren't going to suddenly become interested in ship on ship combat they'll simply either move to other activities or find another game to play. The thing is that for the most part high sec players aren't all that interested in PVP, if they were then they wouldn't be high sec denizens. Null and Low sec denizens are also more prepared and experienced with PVP circumstances while in many cases the high sec bears are not at all prepared for surprise PVP as such you'll see a severe drop of people running incursions and going back to the more secure yet still lucrative L4s. In highsec you'll see more mixed operations with NPC corpies and all sorts of alliances and corporations. Null and low runners are generally going to be alliance or coalition members who are on the same "team" so to speak, as such you can generally be pretty confident that you're relatively safe from your fleet mates. You can't bubble up the gates, you can only effectively camp one side of the gates these factors significantly reduce ones ability to secure the Incursion site from the random bottom feeders interested in 0 risk PVP (which is what attacking PVE ships is).īut the biggest issues would be of trust and attitude.
#Eve online incursion groups free
Well for one travel through high sec to the incursion would be completely risk free (unlike travel in low or null). I also know our territory was far less secure than Goon space.īottom line, all the anti-Incursion people are angry, not because they are worried about the integrity of the game, but because other groups are actually gaining ISK, leveling the playing field, which those at the top hate. That is what we did at our peak.įurther, you are moving moon goo through very secure null sec space.Īnd please don't try to snow me my about how dangerous 0.0 is. Try handling 18 POS's with 60 characters. Last month we poured 18 tech moons worth of income into subcapital reimbursements alone, tell me more about how we don't give enough ISK to our membersĪnd wow one tech moon, i am impressed by your tenacity, we only have to fuel/empty/time 60+ along with 150+ other towers across 6-7 regions Maybe if you guys actually paid your rank and file members a bit more of the raw income from 0.0 spoils, you would have more available for ops, instead of seeing them running high sec incursions. What game mechanic stops people in high sec from protecting themselves like those in low sec? I say leave the high sec bears their safe income stream, I need a market for my wares so I can afford expensive non-doctrine ships to get blown up (we don't share the Goonies wonderfully liberal reimbursement plan ). Just like all the "move L4s to low sec" it's predicated on the fallacious idea that the bears will just continue along their normal behavior rather than adapting (moving to more secure income streams or use less costly ships). This is just another low sec gank bear "I can't find easy targets so force people to feed me killmails" whine. Seriously bad idea, if the isk is really a problem (I don't think it is) then lower the payouts. Of course that would mean you'd be facing people who would be prepared to fight back.
To the OP, you know if you want to hunt Incursion runners you could always find some in Low or Null right? You realize that doing so would nerf null income as well right? I mean who else is going to by those X-type modules for fat iskies but high sec bears with more isk than sense?
0 kommentar(er)
